Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDe Vos, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Nigel
dc.contributor.other
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Law
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-07T13:13:26Z
dc.date.available2010/03/24 02:27
dc.date.available2010/03/24
dc.date.available2014-02-07T13:13:26Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/2795
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractUnder the United Nations Charter, the Security Council may decide what measures, not involving the use of armed force, are to be employed to give effect to its decisions and may call upon member States to apply such measures in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.2 One of the measures that can be decided on is sanctions. Sanctions have, to a large extent, been imposed to defend human rights. Economic sanctions were commonly believed to be a mechanism that was a humane alternative to war. During the last decade, the Security Council has applied economic sanctions in several cases that, in turn, have drawn the attention of different United Nations human rights bodies and mechanisms to their possible impact on the enjoyment of human rights.3 Fundamentally, any economic sanctions programme's main objective is to induce dysfunction in the trade and financial systems of the target State.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectEconomic sanctionsen_US
dc.subjectSouth African and Iraqen_US
dc.titleThe impact of economic sanctions on the right to Health: a comparative study between South African and Iraqen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.description.countrySouth Africa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record