Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGerhard, Werle
dc.contributor.authorJudith Christabella, Aceng
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-06T10:42:05Z
dc.date.available2014-11-06T10:42:05Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/3811
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractThe coming into force of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (hereafter “Rome Statute”) in July 20022 was a thriving success for the international community insofar as that it contributed greatly to international criminal law jurisprudence. The Rome Statute establishes the International Criminal Court (hereafter “ICC”) and confers upon the ICC jurisdiction over the international crimes namely: the crime of Genocide; Crimes against Humanity; War Crimes and the Crime of Aggression. However, the execution of the Courts mandate is rather based two core principles that the Court operates on: the Principle of Complementarity, and the Principle of Cooperation. The principle of complementarity is to the effect that the jurisdiction of the ICC to prosecute those most responsible for committing international core crimes is subsidiary to that of national jurisdictions.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectChallengesen_US
dc.subjectComplementarityen_US
dc.subjectImplementationen_US
dc.subjectInternational core crimesen_US
dc.subjectInternational Criminal Courten_US
dc.subjectInternational Criminal Court Acten_US
dc.subjectProsecutionen_US
dc.subjectRome statuteen_US
dc.subjectState partyen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.titleProgress and challenges of implementing the Rome statute of the international criminal court in Ugandaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record