| dc.description.abstract | "Ethnicity" and disparate group-based socio-economic development make governance in Africa
problematic. Despite this existential reality, the "ethnic" question in African governance remains,
largely, only the subject of general discourse. There appears to be very little rigorous scholarship
on the economic and socio-cultural dimensions related to the socio-historical construct,
"ethnicity". Similarly, attempts to explain why African political culture, in general, continues to
encourage the social reproduction of "ethnic" identities also appear to be largely lacking. This
thesis aims to fill some of the gaps existent in scholarship of ethnicity vis-a-vis socio-economiccultural
development by examining the antagonism between the Luo community and the Kenyan
state. Its main objectives are to examine the specifics of the socio-economic consequences of the
political marginalization of the Luo and to explain why "ethnicity" is, seemingly, strongly
correlated with the crisis of state power in Kenya. This thesis is grounded on the following two
major assertions: first, that "ethnicity", like its correlative, "race", is an ideological concept,
devoid of any scientific substance; second, that "ethnicity" is an "exogenous construct", imposed
on aboriginal people of Africa mostly by European colonizers. | |
