Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorScholtz, W
dc.contributor.authorChien, Li-Fen
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-23T07:56:30Z
dc.date.available2021-03-23T07:56:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/8008
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractThe number of environmental offences taking place continues to increase each year. Despite the special position of responsibility occupied by directors as the ‘directing mind and will’ of the companies responsible for the commission of these offences, directors appear to continue to be shielded unconditionally behind the separate legal personality of the company. This thesis consists of a thorough examination of existing environmental laws, as well as the Companies Act 71 of 2008 and the King IV Report on Corporate Governance, to determine whether the provisions contained therein may be interpreted so as to depart from the principle of separate legal personality (as provided for by corporate law) in order to hold directors personally liable for environmental transgressions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental righten_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental transgressionen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental crimesen_US
dc.subjectDirector liabilityen_US
dc.subjectPersonal liabilityen_US
dc.subjectPolluter pays principleen_US
dc.titleDo existing laws in South Africa hold directors personally liable for environmental transgressions?en_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record