Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKoen, Raymond
dc.contributor.authorPhilipp, Julia
dc.contributor.other
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Law
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-04T13:32:54Z
dc.date.available2011/02/21 07:06
dc.date.available2011/02/21
dc.date.available2013-12-04T13:32:54Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/2510
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper will analyse critically the main sources, namely UNCAC, the African Union Convention on Prevention and Combating Corruption (AU Convention), the Southern African Development Community Protocol against Corruption (SADC Protocol) and the Council of Europe Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (CoE Convention). Furthermore, the paper will examine the corresponding explanatory notes and try to provide a picture of the most important aspects of the issue. As many countries are obliged to consider the criminalisation of trading in influence, drawing an overview of it may make a substantial contribution to its comprehension. Due to the limited space, the paper is unable to cover all provisions of trading in influence in countries where it exists. Accordingly, the discussion will be restricted to the situation in France, Spain and Belgium. By analysing the position in these countries, the different approaches to criminalisation can be highlighted.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectForeign trade regulationen_US
dc.subjectLaw and legislationen_US
dc.subjectCriminal provisionsen_US
dc.subjectTradeen_US
dc.subjectCorrupt practicesen_US
dc.subjectCorporationsen_US
dc.subjectCorrupt practicesen_US
dc.subjectInternational tradeen_US
dc.titleThe criminalisation of trading in influence in international anti-corruption lawsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.description.countrySouth Africa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record