| dc.contributor.advisor | Fernandez, Lovell | |
| dc.contributor.author | Moroga, Denis wangwi | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-03T11:36:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-12-31T22:10:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11394/6367 | |
| dc.description | Department of Criminal Justice and Procedure | |
| dc.description.abstract | Money laundering (ML) evolves in tandem with global technological advancement. This
phenomenon calls for multi-faceted responsive measures at national and international levels
to combat this nefarious crime.1 Today, combating ML requires co-operation among, inter
alia, financial intelligence units (FIUs), reporting institutions, law enforcement agencies, the
judiciary, as well as inter-state co-operation. In response to the ML threat, Kenya has adopted
comprehensive anti-money laundering (AML) laws, such as the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-
Money Laundering Act No. 9 of 2009 (POCAMLA) and the Prevention of Terrorism Act No. 30
of 2012. These, among other statutes, constitute the principal arsenal of the AML legal
framework. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | University of the Western Cape | |
| dc.subject | Competent authorities, Confidentiality principle, Financial institutions, Financial intelligence units, Kenya, Money laundering, Palermo Convention, Reporting institutions, Vienna Convention | |
| dc.title | An appraisal of the Institutional framework under the Kenyan proceeds of crime and Anti-Money laundering act, 2009 | |
| dc.rights.holder | University of the Western Cape | |
