Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWeideman, Albert
dc.contributor.authorHabte, Abrahaley
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T11:12:14Z
dc.date.available2020-10-29T11:12:14Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/7387
dc.descriptionMagister Philosophiae - MPhilen_US
dc.description.abstractTask based language instruction has generated some debate among researchers. Some argue in favour of task based language instruction by claiming that tasks focus learners' attention on meaning and thus facilitate second language acquisition (Prahbu, 1987; Pica and Doughty, 1986; Pica, Kanagy, and Falodun,1993). Others argue against task based language instruction and call into question the concept of comprehensible input, the idea upon which the whole task based approach is based (Sheen, 1994).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectSupplementary materialsen_US
dc.subjectEnglish languageen_US
dc.subjectTask based languageen_US
dc.subjectInformation gap tasksen_US
dc.titleThe development of supplementary materials for English language teaching in a scarce resource environment: an action research studyen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record