Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorOcran, Matthew
dc.contributor.advisorBladergroen, Bernard
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Shadeon Doawon
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-23T08:17:28Z
dc.date.available2021-03-23T08:17:28Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/8009
dc.descriptionMagister Commercii - MComen_US
dc.description.abstractIn order to comply with the Air Quality Act 2010, Eskom will have to install flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) plants for both new and old power stations. Wet-flue gas desulphurisation (wet-FGD) is adopted world-wide as an effective flue gas treatment technology and therefore will be adopted by Eskom. During the process of desulphurisation, the flue gas is stripped of SO2 but gains a substantial amount of water. Sustaining this process requires a continuous supply of fresh water, a scarce resource in many places where power stations are built. This research investigates the economic feasibility of technologies capable of recovering water from flue gas. The following technologies were considered to capture water vapour from flue gas taking Eskom’s Medupi Power Station as a case study; condensing heat exchanger technology, desiccant drying systems and membrane technology using membrane modules developed by other students in this project. The water vapour selective membrane technology turned out to be superior.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectEconomic analysisen_US
dc.subjectFlue gasen_US
dc.subjectWater scarcityen_US
dc.subjectWet-flue gas desulphurisationen_US
dc.subjectMembrane technologyen_US
dc.titleEconomic analysis of water recovery from flue gas: A South African case studyen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record