Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorvan Reenen, T. P.
dc.contributor.authorMgawuli, Zuko Aubrey
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T09:03:36Z
dc.date.available2023-06-13T09:03:36Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/10202
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractThe most contentious issue in the present South African Constitution is the realization of the rights entrenched therein. These rights are contentious because they are justifiable in their nature, subject to judicial processes and courts have in many cases interpreted them to impose positive and negative duties against the state. Positive duty means that it is the state responsibility to ensure that at least something is done (positively) in the realization thereo1 and negative duty means that the state must refrain from obstructing the functioning of the right. It is often argued against the realization of the rights that the state has limited resources to put rights in reality because for the rights to be realized they require pumping in of resources. In the discussions of the right to sufficient water and sanitation on which this paper is focusing, various factors make this right a little difficult to be realized. These factors include amongst others the scarcity of water resources in the country and the tension between human and environmental needs in the resource utilization.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectWater and sanitationen_US
dc.subjectConstitutionen_US
dc.subjectEcologyen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectNatural resourcesen_US
dc.titleThe use of groundwater as an option for the realization of the right of access to basic water and sanitation in South Africaen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record