Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHolmes, Haly
dc.contributor.advisorPeck, M. Thabit
dc.contributor.advisorBasson, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorAbdalrahman, Basheer Mohamed
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-14T05:50:05Z
dc.date.available2014-11-14T05:50:05Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/3843
dc.description>Magister Scientiae - MScen_US
dc.description.abstractDifferent chlorhexidine (CHX) preparations and formulations are available in local markets. Some preparations contain anti-discoloration systems (ADS), additional antimicrobials like cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), or alcohol. The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial efficacies of 3 different CHX preparations (Corsodyl®, Curasept® and GUM® Paroex®)en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectChlorhexidineen_US
dc.subjectAntimicrobialen_US
dc.subjectEfficacyen_US
dc.subjectDental plaqueen_US
dc.subjectOral rinseen_US
dc.subjectFacultative anaerobesen_US
dc.subjectStrict anaerobesen_US
dc.subjectStreptococcus mutansen_US
dc.subjectCandida albicansen_US
dc.subjectDisk diffusion testen_US
dc.titleThe antimicrobial efficacy of three chlorhexidine mouth rinses: an in-vitro analysisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record