Library Portal | UWC Portal | National ETDs | Global ETDs
    • Login
    Contact Us | About Us | FAQs | Login
    View Item 
    •   ETD Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Department of Criminal Justice and Procedure
    • Magister Legum - LLM (Criminal Justice and Procedure)
    • View Item
    •   ETD Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Department of Criminal Justice and Procedure
    • Magister Legum - LLM (Criminal Justice and Procedure)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Scrutinising the modes of responsibility under the Rome statute : settling the dust

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Thesis (5.943Mb)
    Date
    2015
    Author
    Belay, Markos Debebe
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Under international criminal law (ICL), there are factual and legal intricacies. Of these intricacies, the issues concerning the modes of responsibility, which are enshrined under Article 25(3) of the ICC Statute, have been the preponderant focus. Specifically, besides the incongruity on the approaches of distinguishing among each other, there is no unanimity on the question of degrees of blameworthiness. Put differently, under ICL, there is uncertainty on how to draw a line among the modes of responsibility and the raison d'etre behind their enumeration. These ambivalences have caused various arguments both in and outside the ICC.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11394/5165
    Collections
    • Magister Legum - LLM (Criminal Justice and Procedure)

    DSpace 6.3 | Ubuntu | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace 6.3 | Ubuntu | Copyright © University of the Western Cape
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV