Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNadasen, Krishnavelli Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorOmukunyi, Bernard
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-01T13:35:41Z
dc.date.available2021-04-01T13:35:41Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/8113
dc.descriptionPhilosophiae Doctor - PhDen_US
dc.description.abstractThe Joint United Nations Programme on HIV (UNAIDS) strongly recommends that developing countries regard medical male circumcision as a biomedical intervention. This recommendation has caused developing countries seeking a radical solution to the prevailing and persistent social problem of HIV to reform their health policies. Most now discourage traditional male circumcision and promote safe medical male circumcision (SMMC) as a strong contributor to reductions in HIV transmission. This has introduced conflicts in traditional African societies such as the Bugisu, where male circumcision is culturally motivated, symbolising a rite of passage from boyhood to manhood. In the Bugisu sub-region, the local Bamasaaba regard their cultural practice of traditional male circumcision (TMC) as prestigious.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectBamasaabaen_US
dc.subjectTraditionen_US
dc.subjectSafe medical male circumcisionen_US
dc.subjectTraditional male circumcisionen_US
dc.subjectHegemonic masculinityen_US
dc.titleThe Bamasaaba people's response to the safe medical male circumcision policy in Ugandaen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record