Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBheki, R.
dc.contributor.authorFayayo, Rodrick
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-07T08:13:32Z
dc.date.available2021-04-07T08:13:32Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/8153
dc.descriptionPhilosophiae Doctor - PhDen_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis deploys deliberative democracy in order to explore interactions in polity dualism in Matebeleland South and Matebeleland North, in Zimbabwe. The thesis was premised on two major problems in the way the issue of traditional leadership is generally talked about and studied. First, there is a theoretical problem in terms of how we study and talk about traditional leaders and their contribution in a democracy. Secondly, the institution of traditional leadership is assessed based on assumptions as opposed to hard facts. Methodologically, the study is based on a qualitative case study research design using focus group discussions, key informant interviews and document analysis that enabled an analysis of perceptions, opinions, experiences, and attitudes of residents regarding Zimbabwe’s dual local government system.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectPoliticiansen_US
dc.subjectTraditional leadersen_US
dc.subjectZimbabween_US
dc.subjectRural governanceen_US
dc.subjectDemocracyen_US
dc.titleLocal government duality and its discontents: Rural governance and contestations for power and influence between elected officials and traditional leaders in Matabeleland, Zimbabween_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record