Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorThompson, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorDaniels, D. Victor
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-07T09:31:13Z
dc.date.available2022-09-07T09:31:13Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/9296
dc.descriptionMasters in Public Administration - MPAen_US
dc.description.abstractThis research report examines whether election promises find their way into public policy. This question has a particular significance for a fledgling democracy such as South Africa's. During the run-up to South Africa's first democratic elections n 1994,the electorate was wooed with a litany of promises in respect of a number of social issues. This first election is widely regarded as having been an Uhuru election, i.e. a freedom election for the majori6, of South Africans. There was therefore not only a lot at stake for the contesting political parties, but infinitely more for the electorate. Predictably the voter turn-out nationally was inordinately high. It would probably not be inaccurate to state that there is a high correlation between this high voter turn-out and the promise of freedom. However, in this report this student wishes to propose that the voter turn-out was also about the expectation that the new democratic government would take responsibility to deliver essential services such as housing to the previously disenfranchised and materially neglected segments of the population - in short, that its policies would be welfarist. In the post-l994 period, it is becoming apparent that the clarion call of 'housing for all' has become a major problem. It would appear that this is the result of the adoption by the new government of macro-economic policies which limits social spending. What we, therefore, see is a dissonance between election promises and public policy. This raises the question whether government policies meet the criteria of being socially just. When policies are experienced as socially unjust they promote amongst the disadvantaged populace feelings of political apathy and alienation. These are phenomena that the young South African democracy cannot afford. In conclusion, recommendations are made which it is hoped will be useful to especially those outside of government who concern themselves with the important issue of public policy formulation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectElectionsen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectUhuruen_US
dc.subjectAfrican National Congress (ANC)en_US
dc.subjectNational Party (NP)en_US
dc.subjectDemocratic Party (DP)en_US
dc.subjectQualitative studyen_US
dc.subjectFreedom Charteren_US
dc.subjectKliptownen_US
dc.subjectUnited Democratic Front (UDF)en_US
dc.subjectCape Housing Action Committee (CAHAC)en_US
dc.titleElection promises and public policy: Never the twain shalt meet? the case of housing.en_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record