Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSloth-Nielsen, Julia
dc.contributor.authorMezmur, Benyam Dawit
dc.contributor.otherNULL
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-13T13:23:12Z
dc.date.available2013/09/11
dc.date.available2013/09/11 10:39
dc.date.available2014-03-13T13:23:12Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/2993
dc.descriptionDoctor Legum - LLDen_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough it may seem ironic that a policy affecting so few children should engage so much political and social attention, the symbolic significance of intercountry adoption far outweighs its practical import. This fact is partly demonstrated by the polarised views on intercountry adoption, and opinions continue to be divided over the necessity and propriety of the practice. At present, there can be few who would quibble with the fact that African children are attracting an increasing attention from prospective adoptive parents living in other parts of the world. Celebrity adoptions (the adoptions of Angelina Jolie and Madonna) have contributed to this increased interest in African children. While intercountry adoption from African countries is still quite modest compared to adoptions from the top four countries of origin, there are concrete reasons to believe that interest in adoption from African countries will continue to increase. Thus, while Africa is “the new frontier” for intercountry adoption - it is highly questionable if the continent is equipped to provide its children with the necessary safeguards in respect of the practice. A central thesis of this study was to explore how the best interests of the African child can be upheld in intercountry adoption. In connection with this thesis, a number of related research questions were raised, such as: does the African context present any peculiar situations that are relevant to intercountry adoption? Does the African Children’s Charter (ACRWC) add any value to the provisions of the CRC in addressing African realities relevant for intercountry adoption? What are some of the challenges, lessons, and opportunities for the regulation of intercountry adoption on the African continent? Five themes are considered in dedicated Chapters of this study. They are the African context; the international legal framework; adoptability; the principle of subsidiarity; and illicit activities in respect of intercountry adoption. It is argued that context matters, and there are historical, cultural, social, religious, and legal contexts that are relevant for intercountry adoption in Africa. Since human rights issues are at the core of the current debate over intercountry adoption, international children’s rights law is also very crucial for the discussion. Four countries (Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi and South Africa) are used in this study in supplementary fashion to demonstrate African countries’ experiences. The study identifies the role of various stakeholders for the promotion and protection of children’s rights in Africa in respect of intercountry adoption. It is concluded that as a predominantly sending continent, Africa’s views on intercountry adoption issues should be seriously considered and taken into account, if a socially and legally sound, and child-centred, intercountry adoption regime is to be formed on the continent.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectPatienten_US
dc.subjectHealth servicesen_US
dc.subjectDelaysen_US
dc.subjectTuberculosisen_US
dc.subjectSocial factorsen_US
dc.subjectTreatmenten_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectSymptom onseten_US
dc.subjectDiseaseen_US
dc.subjectCase detectionen_US
dc.titleIntercountry adoption in an African context: a legal perspectiveen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright: University of the Western Capeen_US
dc.description.countrySouth Africa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record