Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMezmur, Benyam Dawit
dc.contributor.authorLouw, Sideen
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-27T12:04:07Z
dc.date.available2020-11-27T12:04:07Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/7586
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractEuthanasia is controversial topic that attracts conversations on grounds of fundamental human rights and freedoms. The opinions of legal scholars are inconsistent because while some view euthanasia as a gross violation of one’s human rights, others argue that it should be regarded as a fundamental human right. Extending the ‘right to die’ to children is more controversial because they are considered to be a vulnerable demographic and generally presumed to be legally incompetent to exercise their rights autonomously. The State aims to protect children by restricting their rights rather than enhancing their autonomy and including them in the discussion. To that end, children are often excluded from decision-making on the understanding that they are legally incompetent and cannot comprehend the consequences of their decisions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectAutonomy/Agencyen_US
dc.subjectChildren’s Rightsen_US
dc.subjectCognitive abilityen_US
dc.subjectEuthanasiaen_US
dc.subjectHuman Rightsen_US
dc.titleRights of the child and Euthanasia in the context of South Africaen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record