Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWandrag, Riekie
dc.contributor.authorFieties, Leon
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-24T10:15:41Z
dc.date.available2014-07-24T10:15:41Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/3505
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractThe classic justification for Letters of Credit is that it provides an effective assurance of payment from a financially responsible third party. Cross-border transactions magnify the concern of non-payment from a buyer because litigation is not only costly, but it also normally occurs in a foreign and unfamiliar forum. Not only do Letters of Credit provide assurance to the seller that it will be paid, even if the buyer would not pay voluntarily but it also compensate for the weakness of relational ties between the buyer and the seller, should no such ties exist at the time the contract is established.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectChinese letters of credit lawen_US
dc.subjectIndependent principleen_US
dc.subjectInternational payment systemsen_US
dc.subjectLetters of crediten_US
dc.subjectSouth African letters of credit lawen_US
dc.subjectStrict compliance principleen_US
dc.subjectThe fraud exceptionen_US
dc.subjectUniform customs and practice (UCP)en_US
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom letters of credit lawen_US
dc.subjectUnited States of America letters of credit lawen_US
dc.titleLetters of credit - the fraud exception: a time for conformityen_US
dc.rights.holderuwcen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record