Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorOgunniyi, M.B.
dc.contributor.authorOkoroh, Nwakaego Esther Malin
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T10:50:31Z
dc.date.available2021-03-25T10:50:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/8047
dc.descriptionMagister Educationis - MEden_US
dc.description.abstractThe clamour in the country about the poor performance of learners in the area of physical science is a concern and this problem had been attributed to different facets of learning which include the amendment of curriculum over the years. But my question is; can the curriculum amendment succeed without effective teaching approaches? This poignant question formed the central concern for this investigation. This study examined two cohorts of grade seven learners’ conceptions of conservation of energy using a Dialogical Argumentation Instructional Model (DAIM) as well as the Traditional Lecture Method (TLM). The study involved 48 learners selected from two public schools in Cape Town. Using a quasi-experimental (Non-equivalent groups) design, the study examined the two groups from different schools (24 learners in each). It exposed one group to the Traditional Lecture Method (TLM) and the other group to a Dialogical Argumentation Instructional Model (DAIM) which was based on two argumentation frameworks– Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) and Contiguity Argumentation Theory (CAT).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectArgumentationen_US
dc.subjectCollaborative learningen_US
dc.subjectDialogical argumentation instructional modelen_US
dc.subjectToulmin’s argumentation patternen_US
dc.subjectContiguity argumentation theoryen_US
dc.titleConceptions of conservation of energy among grade seven learners in two cape town schoolsen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record