Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHuysamen, Elsabe
dc.contributor.authorKeil, Lara
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-16T08:45:55Z
dc.date.available2023-05-16T08:45:55Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/9996
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractThe first democratic national elections held in 1994 marked the start of a new democratic era for South Africa, built upon the foundations of non-discrimination, democracy and equality for all.1 At the heart of the new democratic South Africa, is the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (hereafter “Constitution”). Constitutional supremacy is arguably one of the most important attributes of a true constitutional democracy.2 Section 2 of the Constitution provides that the Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic and that any law or conduct which is inconsistent with it is invalid.3 The Constitution thus functions as the yardstick against which all laws and actions are judged.4 Any law or conduct inconsistent with the Constitution may be challenged.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectDiscriminationen_US
dc.subjectLabour lawen_US
dc.subjectMental healthen_US
dc.subjectWorld Health Organization (WHO)en_US
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.titleThe regulation of mental health in the South African workplace: a comparative analysis of South Africa, the Netherlands, Northern Ireland and the United Kingdomen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record