Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBeck, Simon
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Brandon John Emile
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T13:01:41Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T13:01:41Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/10821
dc.descriptionMasters of Arten_US
dc.description.abstractNon-reductionist theories of personal identity have become less popular than they once were. However, they are quick to discuss the implications of their theories on real problems, such as abortion, head transplants and other practical concerns. As I will go on to argue, I think they are too quick. I aim to show that non-reductionist theories cannot offer adequate guidance on our practical concerns, or if they do, they are severely limited in the kinds of guidance they can provide since their theories are compromised at either the metaphysical or logical level. Instead, I suggest that these theories focus on strengthening their positions before we can take their guidance seriously.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectPersonal identityen_US
dc.subjectNon-reductionist theoriesen_US
dc.subjectReductionist theoriesen_US
dc.subjectPractical guidanceen_US
dc.subjectMetaphysicsen_US
dc.titlePersonal Identity and Practicalities: Can non-reductionist theories guide our practical issuesen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record