Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGallinetti, Jacqui
dc.contributor.authorMurungi, Lucyline Nkatha
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-20T10:15:49Z
dc.date.available2014-06-20T10:15:49Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/3385
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractWhen the Rome Statute was being drafted, referral of a situation by a state party was thought to have the least potential for making the International Criminal Court (hereinafter referred to as the ICC) operational. It was frequently pointed out that States were notoriously reluctant to complain against other states on a bilateral basis. As M.ahnoush Arsanjani and W. W.Michael Reisman, two expert commentators on the ICC, have observed: Before and during the Rome negotiations, no one -- neither states that were initially skeptical about the viability of an international criminal court nor states that supported it assumed that governments would want to invite the future court to investigate and prosecute crimes that had occurred in their territory.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectRole of sub-regionalen_US
dc.subjectCourtsen_US
dc.subjectHuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectAfricaen_US
dc.titleRevisiting the role of sub-regional courts in the protection of human rights in Africaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record