Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAdam, Mohamed E.
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, Joanna Louise
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-15T09:24:53Z
dc.date.available2014-10-15T09:24:53Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/3777
dc.descriptionMagister Psychologiae - MPsychen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the two most dominant sexual discourses were the male sexual drive discourse and the have/hold discourse. These discourses, together with traditional gender constructions, made condom negotiation difficult for women. Nevertheless, the discourses and constructions were also resisted and challenged. This study was limited by its focus on heterosexual women and the negotiation of condom use. Future studies which explore alternate forms of safe sex, sexual orientation and allow men’s experiences to emerge would provide greater insight.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectConstruction of genderen_US
dc.subjectHeterosexual discoursesen_US
dc.subjectSocial constructionismen_US
dc.subjectpoweren_US
dc.subjectBarriers to condom useen_US
dc.subjectHIV/AIDSen_US
dc.subjectRisk factorsen_US
dc.subjectQualitative researchen_US
dc.subjectDiscourse analysisen_US
dc.titleFemale students’ experiences of power dynamics as reflected in the negotiation of condom useen_US
dc.rights.holderuwcen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record