Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLenaghan, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorJurgens, Hishaam
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-04T08:20:43Z
dc.date.available2015-05-04T08:20:43Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/4099
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractThis mini-thesis is based on the presumption that the Danish cartoons and the anti-Muslim clip posted on YouTube as forms of expression, ridiculed the religious beliefs and practices of Muslims which in turn affected the exercise of religious freedom as it violated the dignity of the bearers of the right to freedom of religion and therefore a conflict between the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression exists. The above incidence of conflict between the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression involves infringing the freedom of religion of the Islamic community. Blasphemy in Islam is speech that is insulting to God, but during the course of Muslim history it has become increasingly linked with insult to the Prophet Muhammad. In Islam the depiction of the Prophet Muhammad in any way is strictly forbidden and is considered blasphemous.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectReligious dignityen_US
dc.subjectFreedom of religionen_US
dc.subjectFreedom of expressionen_US
dc.subjectConflict of rightsen_US
dc.subjectInternational human rights lawen_US
dc.subjectSharia lawen_US
dc.subjectSalman Rushdieen_US
dc.subjectMohammed cartoonsen_US
dc.subjectLimitation clauseen_US
dc.subjectHierarchy of rightsen_US
dc.titleInvestigating the conflict between freedom of religion and Freedom of expression under the South African constitutionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record