Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSmith, M. R.
dc.contributor.authorHendricks, Abeedah
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-21T20:23:36Z
dc.date.available2015-05-21T20:23:36Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/4183
dc.descriptionMagister Artium (Psychology) - MA(Psych)en_US
dc.description.abstractPostgraduate students are assumed to develop the capacity to conduct research independently and to evaluate their own work as internal supervisors through the process of thesis supervision. Research capacity building amongst postgraduate students is evidenced by the successful completion of degree requirements or graduation, but student retention and throughput is a problem. The study aimed to establish an evidence base of filtered information on interventions addressing the successful completion of thesis requirements in postgraduate students. The study design entailed a systematic review that explored published findings about research reporting on capacity building strategies and initiatives respectively. The researcher made the following ethical considerations namely, transparency, non-bias during data extraction and using two independent reviewers to assist the principle researcher and avoidance of plagiarism as the proposed study is project based and a collaborative process, which are essential when using a systematic review approach. The proposed study forms part of a larger parent study, which aims to identify factors that facilitate or hinder research capacity development in postgraduate students and new academics. The present study used an adaptation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) statement, which is aimed at improving the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Extracted data were subjected to a meta-synthesis, which included descriptive meta-synthesis and theory-explicative meta-synthesis. Eight articles were identified as good quality articles based on methodological rigour. The good quality research identified 1) high quality supervision, 2) faculty modelling, 3) support and 4) protected research time as effective strategies or interventions that stimulate successful completion of the thesis requirement. The use of appropriate theoretical frameworks in understanding supervision was identified as integral to effective strategies. Limitations of the study were identified and recommendations for future research were provided.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectResearch supervisionen_US
dc.subjectPostgraduate studentsen_US
dc.subjectResearch capacity buildingen_US
dc.titleThe establishment of evidence based filtered information on interventions addressing the successful completion of thesis requirements in postgraduate studiesen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record