Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLegassick, M
dc.contributor.authorSwartz, Moshe Edward
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-21T13:09:20Z
dc.date.available2018-08-21T13:09:20Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/6335
dc.descriptionMagister Artium - MAen_US
dc.description.abstractBoth Am-Xhosa and the European farmers, being pastoralists "the search for land and grass was (their) first principle", notes Walker (1928). When they met, they differed fundamentally on the "vital matter oflandholding" . So different were their perspectives, that Lekhehla (1955) suggested, as far as the treaties were concerned: "The Native Chiefs either did not understand the implications of the border treaties, or if they did, never intended to respect such treaties" (p.2 1). Hopper (1980) says the tension between the Europeans and the Africans on the land issue emanated from the fact that "Xhosa expansion" and "colonial expansion" processes were entirely different. While Am-Xhosa expanded in order to "preserve their political integrity" colonists were driven by an economic dynamic they expanded because land was necessary to accommodate growth (1980:261).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectNative Laws Commission 1883en_US
dc.subjectXhosa (African people)en_US
dc.subjectLegislationen_US
dc.subjectColonialismen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectLand reform
dc.subjectLand tenure
dc.subjectLand settlement
dc.subjectNative law
dc.titleAfrican perspectives on the land question: The Native Laws Commission 1883en_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record