Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSloth-Nielsen, Julia Jane
dc.contributor.authorDyers, Bianca
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-27T10:05:13Z
dc.date.available2020-11-27T10:05:13Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/7578
dc.descriptionMagister Legum - LLMen_US
dc.description.abstractSurrogacy on many occasions is referred to a million-dollar industry. Just like many countries, South Africa has prohibited commercial surrogacy, thus South Africa only permits altruistic surrogacy. The prohibition has consequences for third parties such as surrogacy agencies and surrogacy facilitators, as their right to occupation freedom which is guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, is limited. No right is absolute, any right can be limited if it can be proved that it is in the best interest of the public. The prohibition on commercial surrogacy is argued to be in the best interest of the public as it can lead to the exploitation of women and the commodification of children.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectCommercial surrogacyen_US
dc.subjectReproductive autonomyen_US
dc.subjectCommissioning parenten_US
dc.subjectSurrogate motheren_US
dc.subjectSurrogate motherhood agreementen_US
dc.titleDoes the involvement of third parties in surrogacy agreements raise the risk of exploitation of prospective surrogates and prospective parent(s)?en_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record