Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorShaik, Shoayeb
dc.contributor.authorIndermun, Suvarna
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-03T08:39:14Z
dc.date.available2022-03-03T08:39:14Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/8795
dc.descriptionMagister Scientiae Dentium - MSc(Dent)en_US
dc.description.abstractCephalometric landmark detection is important for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. The most common cause of random errors, in both computer-aided cephalometry and manual cephalometric analysis, is inconsistency in landmark detection. These methods are time-consuming. As a result, attempts have been made to automate cephalometric analysis, to improve the accuracy and precision of landmark detection whilst also minimizing errors caused by clinician subjectivity.This mini-thesis aimed to determine the precision of two cephalometric landmark identification methods, namely an artificial intelligence programme (BoneFinder®) and a computer-assisted examination software (Dolphin ImagingTM).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subjectHuman examinationen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectRadiologyen_US
dc.subjectOrthodonticsen_US
dc.titleCephalometric landmark detection: Artificial intelligence vs human examinationen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record