Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChiware, Elisha
dc.contributor.authorMvula, Stuart Pearson
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T06:59:06Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T06:59:06Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/9592
dc.descriptionMasters of Arten_US
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated knowledge of predatory publishing amongst academics and researchers at the Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences (MUBAS). The underlying aim of the study was to develop evidence-based recommendations that could limit the practice of predatory publishing and its associated effects. This study was underpinned by two theoretical frameworks namely, the Prestige Maximisation Model of Higher Education Institutions and the Elite Journals (Prestige model) as well as the Principal Agent Theory. A post-positivist research paradigm was used, and a sequential explanatory design was applied to collect data for the study. A total of 95 academics and research-scientists were surveyed while eight (8) associate professors were interviewed face-to-face using an interview guide.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectOpen Accessen_US
dc.subjectPredatory journalsen_US
dc.subjectHigher educationen_US
dc.subjectScholarly communicationen_US
dc.subjectMalawien_US
dc.titleKnowledge of predatory publishing: A case study of Malawi University of Business and Applied Aciencesen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record