Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMoore, Rob
dc.contributor.authorMetcalfe, Anthea Gail
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T10:46:51Z
dc.date.available2014-06-18T10:46:51Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/3356
dc.descriptionMagister Educationis - MEden_US
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the factors that conditioned the establishment of, and responses to, a centrally coordinated, institution wide change initiative aimed at promoting equity in the academic workplace in an historically white South African university. It is examined by presenting two kinds of analyses, firstly, an institutional analysis that explores the environmental and managerial conditionalities that influenced the reception, interpretation and responses to the national policy framework. Secondly, a bottom-up analysis that explores the distinctive disciplinary contexts that conditioned the responses of the participants. The study reveals that top-down approaches to managing change have limited capacity to influence the nature and pace of change on the ground, despite the best intentions of institutional managers. The study illustrates that the distinctive disciplinary context conditioned the responses to, and outcomes of the change initiative. In this study, the authority of the academic project powerfully trumps the legitimacy and credibility of the institutional transformation initiative.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectHigher educationen_US
dc.subjectAcademic staff transformationen_US
dc.subjectManagerialismen_US
dc.subjectEmployment equityen_US
dc.subjectAffirmative actionen_US
dc.subjectGrowing our own timberen_US
dc.subjectMentoringen_US
dc.subjectAcademic identitiesen_US
dc.titleA response to employment equity policy in a South African University: a case study of an academic mentoring programmeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record